Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Conclusion: Rodney Mullen is still amazing

I don't know if any of y'all ever played the Tony Hawk games, but I did. In these games, one of the characters available for play was Rodney Mullen. Rodney Mullen is awesome.

Anyway, when I beat Tony Hawk 3 with Rodney Mullen in 2002, the game played a video of Rodney skating. It blew my effing mind. To this date, I don't know if I've ever seen anything more impressive or enjoyable to watch. This man inspired me to start skating. While seriously fun, my skating career was rather brief due to the fact that I have the knees of a 74 year old woman. I had 2 operations, and my skating career went the way of Yeller.

Anyway, just watching the guy made me want to skate. He was essentially the founder of freestyle skating, and he is still the most influential creative force in freestyle and street skating.

Born "Rodney Mullen" the 17th of August, 1966, he was doing mind-blowing freestyle skating exhibitions in Japan when we were still shitting in our diapers. This guy is credited for inventing just about every damn move in the book. He invented the ollie. THE OLLIE! I don't know if y'all know what that is, but it's "the jump" with a skateboard. He also is credited for the invention of the kickflip, heelflip, 360 flip, among countless other superbadass tricks. Wikipedia has compiled a list of Rodney's "Trickography" (Trickography: the moves a skater has invented; Currin, 2008).
ONE FOOTED OLLIE?! WTF?! Honestly, how the fook do you do that? 540 double kickflip?! Holy balls in ya butt.

In conclusion, Rodney Mullen is tight. He drops fat tricks like angel shit. He's that smooth. Here are a few hilight videos to further support my point. Be warned, this may inspire you to start skating. They changed my life...for about 2 years.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1U-cgn3cEGA&NR=1

Monday, December 29, 2008

How aware are you NOW?

Are you aware that this stooge just got served by a huge yellow dog?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfNC-GjVi60

Wednesday, December 24, 2008

Merry Christmas

Feliz Navidad fools, lets get this blog rolling again after the holiday

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

Sunday, December 14, 2008

Monday, December 1, 2008

A belated Happy Thanksgiving

I want to wish everyone reading this a belated happy Thanksgiving. I hope that, in this time of thanks, we were all able to remember the story of thanksgiving and what it is all about.

The first Thanksgiving is believed to have occurred, as we all know, at the Plymouth Plantation in 1621. The pilgrims had been living in the new world for about a year at the time. Needless to say, their brief stay had not been what they expected. Here's roughly how the first year played out:

1) A bunch of dudes sign the Mayflower Compact, which said some stuff.
2) The pilgrims built some crappy homes out of wood and leaves.
3) The pilgrims totally started screwing up the ecosystems that the natives had so easily and effectively preserved. The nightcrawler, a now invasive species of earthworm, started wreaking havoc upon the earth as the natives knew it.
4) The pilgrims grew some tobaccy.
5) Tons of pilgrims got sick and died.
6) The pilgrims fought the natives and were getting their asses handed to them, like in last of the Mohicans.

That basically brings us up to the first Thanksgiving celebration. The history of this event is well known. Roughly one week before the first Thanksgiving celebration, a bunch of sickly colonists got together and decided they were tired of this shit. They were tired of crappy food and fighting losing battles against the natives. So, they plotted to bury the hatchet, as the saying goes. They called a peace treaty with the natives, which roughly stated, "Hey. We're sick and tired and hungry. I guess we could like you guys, sort of. Will you kill some turkeys and get some of your squash and stuff and host a feast for us. We'll call it Thanksgiving, because we'll be thankful for your gesture of peace." But, little did the natives know, that this event would bring about their untimely demise.

The first thanksgiving was held shortly afterward. The natives surely delivered. They brought their finest turkeys, squashes, pumpkins, corn, gravy, mashed potatoes, cranberry sauce, sweet potato casseroles, stuffing, and a shit-ton of beer. The colonists were overjoyed. They greedily ate the majority of the feast, leaving little for the natives to enjoy.

When the feast was finally over, the natives and the colonists joined hands in thanks. Together, they composed a song to sing in celebration of their peace. "You're the Voice," the song composed at the first Thanksgiving, was later made popular by the English rockstar John Farnham in 1985. Afterward, everyone returned to their dwellings and succumbed to food comas.

While the celebration was taking place, however, a small band of colonists secretly invaded the native American dwellings and put poisonous scorpions in all of their blankets. When the natives returned to their dwellings to sleep, the scorpions stung their asses bad. The pilgrims then swooped in like smokey demons, and destroyed those natives in their weakened, swollen-ass state.

After their victory, the pilgrims declared that the day should be marked and remembered as "Thanksgiving." They declared that future generations of colonists should remember this day and give thanks. They should give thanks that the natives didn't think of such an awesome plan first, because they would have gotten their asses stung by scorpions, and they would have been scalped. And so, Thanksgiving was born.

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Why The EFF am I not Studying?

This is a pretty interesting idea. What do yall think? It is sort of like the company I volunteered for in Seattle this summer.
http://wimp.com/niceidea/

Oh yeah, sorry I suck lately, it is just proof that law school sucks worse.

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

BOWERBIRDS...


dont know if i will post with or without comment... damn, oops.

Some Science for You All

This blag has become stagnant in recent days, and I decided it was time to recontribute. So, without further delay, here is some science from the consortium scientist.

Confocal Microscopy:
We have a confocal microscope in our lab, and it is hella tight. I have been using it to analyze data concerning the fluorescence of a molecule called lipofuscin. This molecule is special because, in its final form, it cannot be broken down any further within the cell. Therefore, it starts to build up. As it builds up, it can be detected with fluorescence microscopy as "granules" within the cell. These granules are what I've been analyzing. (I still can't tell you why. Stay tuned for that.)
Some Info - (for more, go to wikipedia. That's where this came from) -

"The principle of confocal imaging was patented by Marvin Minsky in 1957.[2] In a conventional (i.e., wide-field) fluorescence microscope, the entire specimen is flooded in light from a light source. Due to the conservation of light intensity transportation, all parts of the specimen throughout the optical path will be excited and the fluorescence detected by a photodetector or a camera. In contrast, a confocal microscope uses point illumination and a pinhole in an optically conjugate plane in front of the detector to eliminate out-of-focus information. Only the light within the focal plane can be detected, so the image quality is much better than that of wide-field images. As only one point is illuminated at a time in confocal microscopy, 2D or 3D imaging requires scanning over a regular raster (i.e. a rectangular pattern of parallel scanning lines) in the specimen. The thickness of the focal plane is defined mostly by the square of the numerical aperture of the objective lens, and also by the optical properties of the specimen and the ambient index of refraction."

"

CLSM is a scanning imaging technique in which the resolution obtained is best explained by comparing it with another scanning technique like that of the scanning electron microscope (SEM). Do not confuse CLSM with phonograph-like imaging—AFM or STM, for example, where the image is obtained by scanning with an atomic tip over a surface.

In CLSM a fluorescent specimen is illuminated by a point laser source, and each volume element is associated with a discrete fluorescence intensity. Here, the size of the scanning volume is determined by the spot size (close to diffraction limit) of the optical system because the image of the scanning laser is not an infinitely small point but a three-dimensional diffraction pattern. The size of this diffraction pattern and the focal volume it defines is controlled by the numerical aperture of the system's objective lens and the wavelength of the laser used. This can be seen as the classical resolution limit of conventional optical microscopes using wide-field illumination. However, with confocal microscopy it is even possible to improve on the resolution limit of wide-field illumination techniques because the confocal aperture can be closed down to eliminate higher orders of the diffraction pattern. For example, if the pinhole diameter is set to 1 Airy unit then only the first order of the diffraction pattern makes it through the aperture to the detector while the higher orders are blocked, thus improving resolution at the cost of a slight decrease in brightness. In practice, the resolution limit of confocal microscopy is often limited by the signal to noise ratio caused by the small number of photons typically available in fluorescence microscopy. One can compensate for this effect by using more sensitive photodetectors or by increasing the intensity of the illuminating laser point source. Increasing the intensity of illumination later risks excessive bleaching or other damage to the specimen of interest, especially for experiments in which comparison of fluorescence brightness is required."

In conclusion, it's all about the pinhole baby.

And that is this week's science blag. Stay tuned next week where we wil discuss the most heated question in science: Was T. rex primarily a hunter or a scavenger?

Peace.

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Lists of Stuff, and Yoga to the People

So, as you guys know, last year a bunch of us from DUFF joined a Davidson physical education yoga class. I guess our motivations for joining the class varied, but mine were pretty much that:

1) I would become more flexible, and would therefore not suffer from cramps/injuries during the frisbee season,

2) I would learn a bunch of new stretches, also meant to reduce cramps/injuries,

3) it would be a good way to improve core strength and have another way to get fucking ripped,

4) it'd be a lot of fun with frisbee guys, and

5) it'd be a stress reliever.


I ended up accomplishing all of these goals through dedicated yoga participation, though it is worth noting that I did sprain both ankles in Regionals on Day 1 and considered it the end of my Davidson Ultimate career, of course until Emory started being extreme bitches and we got fired up and went on an 11-1 run to beat them, those fuckheads. That, by the way, was one of the best athletics moments I have ever been a part of. The others would include:

1) helping to win our town's Little League World Series as a 5th grader, by hitting five triples in as many at-bats (I batted 7th in the order) during the semi-finals and championship game,

2) doing the "flying camel" dance after skying some punk (didn't happen often) in a frisbee tourney in TN sophomore year,

3) trying to hit somebody in ice hockey as a freshman in high school (5'2", 125lbs) and getting completely upended,

4) ...


Riiiight, I think those are my sports glory moments. Anyway, so yoga was definitely something I enjoyed, for a variety of reasons, and I looked into getting back into it in NYC. Most yoga studios though, charge enormous amounts of money to take classes, which really sucks, naturally. But I then found this place called Yoga to the People online (http://www.yogatothepeople.com/), which totally disavows the idea of paying for yoga... instead, you pay by donation. Its been running like this for years, filling a 4 or 5-story building on the Lower East Side (street: St. Marks, which is one the most chaotic, bohemian, mish-mashed places I've ever seen). You go to the brick-walled studio, do an hour of Vinyasa yoga (which emphasizes "the balance between effort, awareness and breath"), and then leave a donation on the way out. Check out their mission statement on the opening page of the website... it pretty much sums it up.
Anyway, so I went to Yoga to the People last Friday. It was awesome. I remember the yoga class at Davidson being pretty intense at times, but this was super intense... by about mid-way through, my legs were shaking during poses and I was pouring - pouring - sweat, so much so that I went to REI this week and bought some bandanas. Solid. The instructor was really good and was helping people with their movements, and there was a great flow to the class, though I had difficulty concentrating on syncing my breathing with the movements and a calm mental focus because I was concentrated on the action. It seemed like everyone had been doing yoga for quite some time, so the class was able to go continuously and some people there had seriously ridiculous strength and flexibility. I was impressed.
Anyway, I left with a great sense of calm and an elevated sense of excitement about my day, and, walking past all these New Yorkers who were obviously angry or stressed out or just not at peace with themselves, I felt really separate. I'm not a religious guy or even all that spiritual, but I definitely was able to gain this sense of appreciation for what I have and who I am... its kind of hard to explain, but I felt great.
Moral of the story: When you guys come up to snuggle, I'll also bring you to Yoga to the People, because not only was it really demanding physically and the girls were really hot (a solid perk), it was also a really incredible experience. I'll be going again on Friday.
Sousa out.

Darfur?


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7724220.stm

Why is this not on any of the American News Sites?

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

Truly America's Finest News Source


Every once in a while, the onion actually puts out an article that, despite being horrendously offensive, provokes contemplation. Sometimes it takes a good satire, beating you over the head relentlessly with a sock full of quarters, to really make you stop and consider the gravity of an event like this.

http://www.theonion.com/content/news/nation_finally_shitty_enough_to

Image Caption: "After enduring eight years of near constant trauma, the United States is, at long last, ready for equality."

Wildcats

Another thing that got me super-pumped yesterday were these articles... made me miss hanging out with the guys while selling basketball tickets at the games to raise money for frisbee so we could fly to Vegas, play phenomenally well, win $$$, flaunt the "deer claw", and be generally debaucherous.

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/columns/story?id=3655088

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/writers/seth_davis/10/26/davidson/index.html?eref=T1

http://www.charlottemagazine.com/index.php?task=view&option=com_content&Itemid=99999999&id=5261

http://www.sportingnews.com/yourturn/viewtopic.php?t=473853

Get hype for this season. Anyone who wants to come up for the Jimmy V classic at MSG, let me know, I will get tickets and you can sleep on my couch, or, if you're lucky, we can snuggle.

Election Elation

It didn't really, truly hit me last night until Obama got up and gave a phenomenally moving speech.

I am fucking pumped right now. This is awesome.

Grinding up the Gear box!

Lets Change Gears!
http://davidsonwildcats.com/news/2008/11/4/MBB_1104083336.aspx?path=mbball

Obama:Presidential Elections
Curry:Basketball


Tuesday, November 4, 2008

And Yes We Did!

OBAMA

The dogmas of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy present. The occasion is piled high with difficulty, and we must rise with the occasion. As our case is new, so we must think anew, and act anew. We must disenthrall ourselves, and then we shall save our country.

-Abraham Lincoln, 1962

Ohio Goes Obama: 207-89


Peace Out Cub Scout.

Election Commentary: 175-70


Watching all this election hoopla on the cable network channels--CNN, MSNBC, FOX--has an aire of excitement to it. I favor CNN based soley on the fact that its jumbo televisions are the jumboest. I'm using my statistics from www.nytimes.com which has a sleek and cool interactive map that breaks the country down by county.

So the first hour and a half of election coverage much has been pretty uneventful: SC, OK, ARK, KY, GA going McCain and any state northeast of PA plus MI and MN going Obama.

The most interesting story lines thus far are, in no particular order:

1. The projection by many prognosticators of PA going Blue. D-PA Governor Ed Rendell projected nearly a half-million vote lead for Obama when all is said and done. Despite McCain's recent efforts to make the state a lynchpin for his campaign, it looks like Philadelphia and its suburbs made their voting clout felt in the state. Additiontionaly some groups that helped Obama: Hillaryophytes voted in impressive support of Obama (81%), despite the majority still upset about the primaries [and their certainty Obama will be assasinated] and 64% of union workers voted for Obama.

2. The senate races are nice little side story to the presidential race. The projections put Democrats breaking the 60 margin for an anti-filibuster Congress. One specific story, only because I'm here in NC: D-Kay Hagen defeated the incumbent R-Elizabeth Dole--probably due to Dole accusing Hagen of being a "Godless" heathenistic athiest.

3. Where will IN and VA go (leaning McCain)? And what about those troublesome states of OH and and FLA fall (leaning Obama)? Particularly with respect to OH and FLA, these two states will be keys to an Obama landslide or to a tighter race than most thought.

4. One of the news networks has mentioned people have already begun to file lawsuits after going to polls. Given the past two elections, maybe we should get used to these post-election lawsuits. Not very good for the nation's confidence in this country's election system.

5. Why isn't voting on a Saturday or Sunday? Absurd. And are these electionic voting machines really worth all the hassle? Do they make the process significantly easier compared to the potential costs and problems with these machines? How difficult is it for a committee to count ballots that we resort to sometimes faulty and sometimes tampered machines?

6. With an unprecedented number of voters this year, expect every campaign from here on out to follow the "Obama Campaign Plan," which has been almost flawless. Of course, however, it helps when you have the financing to run ads and put ground forces in nearly every state (which is an interesting topic in itself--what is it?: the money/ads/clout-->popularity or popularity-->money/ads/clout).

7. Texas is up for grabs! Wow. The people within those Texan cities there must really hate their former governor.

8. Finally--with a Democratically controlled Congress and Obama in the White House there is an enormous opportunity for this country to take a different path and get this nation back on track. But, equally, if not more, if this Congress and president-elect fail, there may be very, very serious repercussions. Not only politically, but as far as loss of confidence in our institutions, in our country, and in ourselves.

Monday, November 3, 2008

Election Louisiana Style!



Tactius, I must apologize for shifting the focus on this all important night. Allow me to refocus. This video is a little taste of how about 200 Louisianians feel. The rest feel like the excerpt that follows...
Readers underscore value of life
We have a deep concern about the upcoming presidential election. It is a critical election in the history of our nation.

The most important issue when choosing a candidate is their character and morality. Both major presidential candidates have given their stance on abortion and homosexuality, and they are at opposite sides. If we allow human life to be devalued and destroyed in the womb, and if we allow sexual perversion to redefine marriage, then all other issues will eventually cease to matter as society crumbles and falls. We must refuse to vote for a person or political party that endorses abortion and/or the giving of protected (or even privileged) status to homosexuality. This is more important than the economy, taxes, healthcare, social security, immigration and even national defense.

We urge you to pray for our nation and this important election.
(Authors names omitted)

This was an editorial written in Ignatius' and my hometown newspaper.

Let's hope, and if it's your style, pray that whatever happens tomorrow and in the coming days, that it brings our country together. Just because I support one man doesn't mean I have to hate the other. Republicans are not wrong and Democrats are not right, it is only through the combined efforts of all Americans that we can achieve what our founders set out to create.

Oh and a side not about this video. The building in which the band is playing is my grandfather's old office from Opelousas. My grandfather "Reno" was a State Representative and had some close dealings with JFK. He would be proud of what was going on in his old office.

Future of Food



This is a short video of what the slug was talking about. This is some interesting and scary Shiz.

Friday, October 31, 2008

Genetically Engineered Food: Capitalism Making Nature Way Better Than Nature Ever Could Have

I just watched the documentary The Future of Food. Where to begin? For starters the US (unlike the EU) does not mandate that products containing genetically modified organisms be labeled. Nor do they mandate that extensive testing be done on GMOs because they fall under the FDAs umbrella of reasonably safe. This documentary covers several parts of the food production chain and some of the idiosyncrasies that exist therein. For example, after being allowed to patent the seeds they created, seed companies can now patent any natural seed that is not already patented. WTF? Or the fact that many Washington regulators high up in the EPA, FDA, or USDA hold or have held positions with one of the largest seed and GMO developers. A potential conflict of interest? The film touches on the fact that the biotech industry is marketing itself and GMOs as integral in solving the world's hunger crisis, when in fact there is overproduction and over subsidization of crops by the US government.
Imagine that a farmer isn't turning a profit on his Agriflak brand soy, sprayed with liquid weedwhacker from Dupont. It costs this farmer more to grow the soy than he will make by selling it. Agriflak and Dupont aren't worried though, they can rest assured that the government will be backing up their farmer to help pay his bills.
The biotech industry has independent research under its thumb as well. Not too many universities that are funded by large agricultural corporations would, in their right minds, let research be done whose findings would challenge or call into question that corporation's product.

Besides making me want to eat extremely local and organic now, it was just another sad reminder of the sell off of our political system to large corporations and wait for it... special interests. (such a buzzword in this election, along with golden parachutes, main street, maverick, and ACORN) It is also another example of how regulating bodies in our federal government are too large, too corrupt, and do a poor job of looking out for the best interests of Ameican citizens. Luckily there are independent watchdog groups keeping tabs on such things. (Independent groups, keeping an eye on public institutions, that are supposed to be looking out for us....?)

Last thing, a news story that broke more than a month ago

But the agency also says producers would not be required to label most genetically engineered meat, poultry, or seafood. The rules treat altered DNA inserted into livestock as drugs. Companies are not required to alert consumers when antibiotics, hormones, or other drugs are used in raising the animals.

"There is no special labeling requirement simply because the animal itself was engineered," Lutter says.

AHAHAHAHA! Thats insulting. The best part is that the public has until Nov 18th to comment. Good Luck.

David Duke on Obama

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=96373766&ft=1&f=1012

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Presidential races suck

Does anyone else feel like every presidential race they have ever seen is little more than a glorified namecalling match? Seriously, you're grown ass men, and you shouldn't need to be cutting each other down to gain support. Talk about what YOU'RE good at, and how YOU are going to make this country a better place. Don't go on about how stupid the other candidate is or how dumb his vice presidential choice was. I really can't get over it. Then again, maybe that's just politics...a glorified playground shouting match.

This may be the best onion article I have read. I think it best embodies how I perceive this presidential race.

http://www.theonion.com/content/news/i_would_make_a_bad_president_obama

Man, I love good satire.

For more on global climate change...

Here is some light reading for y'all who are more interested in the aforementioned issue:

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/ar4-syr.htm

Just click the "full report" link and you'll get the 52 page IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (that's the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change).

This is a pretty fascinating read, if you get around to it. Read it and learn it. Then, we can harness our powers and kill global warming.

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

The Paradox of Global Warming

I magine with me for a moment.

At some point in the near future, the world experiences an immediate, global, and significant disaster because of global climate change. That is to say, the very basic necessities of human life--water, food, shelter--were to suddenly vanish or dramatically decline. Millions, perhaps billions, of people are displaced and live in refugee camps. A quarter of the human population die. Environmental terrorists begin to attack those whom they deem responsible, mainly environmentally devious industrial corporations and governments. Most target the United States, the only current country who has not ratified the Kyoto Protocol. In response, the United States takes an isolationist policies to "defend" their resources at all costs. Other countries soon follow suit. Millions more die. After five years, half of the global population, three billion humans, have died due to diseases, starvation, and war.

Fortunately, nothing like the apocalyptic scenario has occurred thus far.
Of course, there have been pockets of environmental change in recent years. For example, the increase in frequency and force of tsunamis, hurricanes, drought, and heat waves, the melting of the polar ice caps, and the subtle rise of the ocean levels. Luckily, we, as a global civilization, have not experienced any major environmental calamity due to global warming or climate change.


However, and, in a sense, unfortunately, nothing like the apocalyptic scenario has occurred thus far.
Suppose something a tenth as tragic were to happen. Given the world's current response to the economic crisis, which would seem like a mosquito bite in comparison, it would be reasonable to assume there would be an equal if not greater response to a sudden and dramatic environmental crisis. But this is not how global warming works. Anyone who has seen Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth
or has even read a bit about climate change can attest, the time line for a catastrophic event will not occur within the next few decades, but rather in decades that follow in the twenty-first century.

And herein lies the paradox of global warming: the action by governments, businesses, and individuals needed to stop, or at least lessen, such a scenario would not occur unless a tragedy of proportionate scale occurs; but if that tragedy were to occur, it would be too late to take action and most efforts to ameliorate the problem will be ineffective.

Perhaps Marcos, in his infinite scientific knowledge, can shed some more light on the issue and paradox.


*For a more detailed description of the effects of global warming according to the number of degrees the average global temperature rises in the next century, check out the synopsis of Mark Lynas' incredible book, 6 Degrees. His summation:
If [the environmental historical record] tell us one thing above all, it is this: that we mess with the climatic thermostat of this planet at our extreme - and growing - peril.

Monday, October 27, 2008

Obama's tax plan

I’ve been asked to consider many “enlightening” conservative economic anecdotes, but the one in the bar is my favorite…10 guys go into a bar for a round of tall daddies. At the end of the night, there is a $100 tab. The bartender distributes the owed amounts to the different gentlemen to the effect where three are not required to pay, two pay a small amount, yada yada, and the tenth is finally given a tab of $40 – 40% of the entire tab. This analogy is supposed to be representative of the democratic "tax and spend" system. There's just one problem with this comparison – the top 1% and those along the poverty line are not drinking the same amount of beer. When you're making $250K+, the government does MORE for you, i.e. protection via fire depts, police depts, etc. Therefore, since the top percentile’s interests are more substantial, shouldn’t they be required to pay more? I think so.

Additionally, the Democratic notion of taxing the top 1% is not as simplistic as taxing the successful to "redistribute wealth." Rather, it's an altruistic formula, where a “rising tide raises all ships.” (If you don’t believe me, just ask your parents how well they did under Clinton’s tenure)Since I'm no more than a closed-minded Southerner, I'll give you an example Beaux and I can easily relate to. I have no problem with the fact that my parents' taxes go to the funding of the public schools in the area of Ruston, La., as I would eventually like to return there. By donating pieces of salary, the top percentile can benefit from a surrounding educational system, workforce and society in general who benefits from the allocations. With educated people an economy can prosper. With an uneducated constituence, an economy and society will stagnate at best, but more likely deteriorate.

Obama’s theory of taxation is a reciprocating system which benefits all, not just those receiving benefits directly. If we as a supposed democratic, welfare nation took the cavalier approach of every man for himself, we would inevitably wallow in our self-created demise. Call me a whacky, slippery-slope of a blogger, but revolutions happen, largely due to greed of few coupled with neglect of many.

Undoubtedly, we as a nation should encourage self-responsibility. But we should also have a system that is forgiving, to an extent, and helpful to the less fortunate. Not that I’ve amounted to anything yet, but if I ever do, I’ll be the first to tell you whatever success I have is largely (if not entirely) due to the chances I was given, not earned, but given. There are a whole hell of a lot of people who haven’t been given a lick, and I believe it’s the government’s responsibility to provide at least the most basic sense of welfare for everyone. Kids born into poverty did nothing wrong in utero to “deserve” to be cursed for a lifetime. It’s damn near impossible to pull yourself up when your boots don’t have straps, or when you don’t have boots at all.

A really wise woman once told me, “there’s a difference between hitting a triple and being born on third base.” Think about that.

He Vuelto - I have returned

That's right, I'm back from my journeys through the Iberian peninsula. I could write all the details in my trip, but it would be very difficult to capture everything beyond the activities, sights, or sounds in the streets - there were many emotions tied with being back, the elation of wandering around Madrid while visiting my favorite spots and reading "The Sun Also Rises" while sipping a vermouth at a cafe outside the Plaza Mayor, the excitement of riding a galloping horse through the mountains and valleys of Asturias, and the warm reception when meeting new family members in Lisbon.




So I'll recount a single snapshot for now, and if you'd like more info, I'd like to hear the sounds of your voices anyway, so gimme a call.




"El lenguaje de los sonidos expresa lo inexpresable"




I was sitting with my sister in my favorite hangout in Madrid, Cuevas de Sesamo, a smoky underground sangria bar with waiters in bow ties and a pianist playing classics, and I read the above quote, written with so many others on the limestone walls of the establishment. The language of sound expresses the inexpressible. The quote was written above the piano in the bar, and I wrote it down because I thought it was pretty neat.




A few days later, I was treated to an amazing lunch (tapas, 2 bottles of vino tinto, and some amazing fish) with my sister, the director of the Syracuse abroad program I went on, and two of my favorite professors from my time abroad. One of the professors, Fernando Montes, professor of my Marine Ecology course, was incredibly influential to me when I studied there, teaching me lessons about life in addition to stuff about el fundo del mar. One thing I remember distinctly that he taught me was that you can either live to work, or work to live. It reflects the values placed on priorities in life in Europe and the US... and I've tried to keep his words in mind for much-needed perspective as I embarked on my career. I want to enjoy my life, keep my interests and family and friends as the most important things, and work enough to be comfortable but not too much so that I can live the life that makes me happy. Montes and I were very close when I was studying in Madrid, and we had discussed about me returning to Spain to go hiking with him in the mountains of Asturias - his homeland, a Celtic northern province in Spain - at some point. But I had never had the opportunity to go.




After lunch, Montes invited Laura and I up to Asturias... clearly an opportunity I couldn't pass up. We were supposed to go from Madrid to Lisbon on Thursday, but instead we left Wednesday for Asturias, driving up with Montes as he does every week as soon as his last class is over, so that he can see his girlfriend, brothers/sisters, and mother, and go spend time in the "Lord of the fucking Rings" mountains (as he calls them... they are truly spectacular) and enjoy his homeland and the life there. We arrived at his apartment, which has amazing views of the mountains. His girlfriend was there, and welcomed us warmly. We settled in, all contributed in making various parts of the dinner - Montes teaching me how to make crepes with salmon and cheese, Mapi teaching Laura how to make Asturian clam risotto - and we listened to Celtic music in the background, spoke in Spanish, and really enjoyed a comfortable and fun time together over really great food and wine. After dinner, we all went to Montes' living room and watched a DVD of a Celtic musician - one that Laura and I knew well from our childhood - playing in the Alhambra in Granada. Montes poured various types of single malt Scotch into a small traditional Celtic silver cup, and we all passed it around as a bonding activity and enjoyed the music, with Montes pointing out all of his favorite parts, until late in the night.


I thought about the quote from before. Laura and I are 22 and 20, respectively, while Montes and his girlfriend are both about 50. Between us all, we speak 5 different languages, and hail from diverse and distant parts of the world. We've all had various life experiences, and while there are many things we all share in common - such as a love of the outdoors (we spent the entire following day riding horses in the mountains) - for that night, the music - el lenguaje de los sonidos - forged a certain close bond between us.


The value of time spent with others - so important, and so often lost today, with the melting economy and the hard-driving pace of work and school - really came through during that simple night. When we flew out of Asturias on Friday morning, Montes walked us through the tiny airport, saw us through to our gate, and made sure to tell us how much it meant to him that we felt it important to spend time with him and come to his homeland, and that we will forever have him as a friend.


The few days in Asturias were really the highlight of my trip.

Omaha Supporters Need Not to Apply

Click on the photo, read the last sentence.

Friday, October 24, 2008

"Dollar Bill On Floor Sends Wall Street Into Frenzy"

http://www.theonion.com/content/news/dollar_bill_on_floor_sends_wall

The immediate future is starting to look pretty bright. I'm putting my dollars in the dollar. I'm buying America, unlike that communist turd BeauXtreme.

Damn Thomas Friedman...The world is flat

So I ordered an Ipod earlier this week, and they guaranteed the delivery for today the 24th. They gave me a FedEx tracking number just to...well to keep track of the package. When I check the package, I was amazed. Check out where all my package has been. This is just for a measly Ipod.

http://www.fedex.com/Tracking?action=track&language=english&cntry_code=us&initial=x&tracknumbers=732805102655

Thursday, October 23, 2008

“I have found a flaw."


M r. Sperandeo, my high school economics professor, was fond of saying, "Though I do not have a Doctorate of Philosophy in Economics, I can tell you for certain that Alan Greenspan is the single greatest economic policy decision maker this country has ever had." At that time, he seemed right. The United States and the world had seen one of the greatest economics booms in the history of the modern era and Alan Greenspan was seen by many as the heroic captain of the ship. On the eve of his unprecedented fifth appointment as Fed, Greenspan garnered celebrity status. He was so well received by the public even a Joe the Plumber would take heed of a Greenspan press conference.

But that was then and this is now.

Since his departure from the Fed in 2006, Alan Greenspan has been under a barrage of attacks from politicians, economists, and journalists. In the United States' attempt to understand (and/or find a scapegoat for) the current economic crisis, perhaps no other individual (save W.) has bore the brunt of public criticism more than Greenspan. Almost all of the articles--ranging from the Financial Times to American Banker and led by some of
world’s leading economists, including two Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences winners, Edmund Phelps and Joseph Stiglitz--pin Greenspan as the architect of the economic mess the globe is in today.

Why such sharp criticism? Many point to Greenspan's praise of free market economics while at the same time vehemently opposing any intervention into the arena of his beloved, albeit complex, derivatives to assess risk and securities. One of those, Mortgage Backed Securities, played a major role in creating the current economic tsunami.

Sitting on Capital Hill today fielding bullets from inquiring senators and congresspersons, Alan Greenspan conceded that it was his error in judgment believing in the viability, strength, and self-correcting nature of the unregulated, free-market. He stated, “I made a mistake in presuming that the self-interests of organizations, specifically banks and others, were such as that they were best capable of protecting their own shareholders and their equity in the firms.” Referring to his free-market ideology, Mr. Greenspan added: “I have found a flaw. I don’t know how significant or permanent it is. But I have been very distressed by that fact.”

Now, is this reason to abandon free-market ideology? No. Is this a reason to go on a Teddy Roosevelt-style gang-busting spree? Certainly not. Should we adopt and enforce unprecedented regulation since the late-nineteenth century? Perhaps not, but it looks like we might be headed there anyway.

What is necessary though, isn't more of what has gone on in the media. That is, trying to find a scapegoat or to vilify one group or another. As groups, Wall Street, predatory lenders, home owners, economists, George Bush, derivatives gone mad, and all the other things we've heard in the media are not the root of the problem. Indeed they are problems, but they are only that in so much as they are symptomatic of the problem.

What we must do is address the fundamental problem. The fundamental problem is that our business models, assumptions, risk assessments haven't reflected the immense change in economies over the past half century. One way of addressing this is imposing governmental regulation. But it is important that the regulation is adjusted, changed, invented so that it incorporates and accounts for these changes in the economy of the United States and economies abroad. Similarly, another way to address the problem is a significant reevaluation of commonly held economic beliefs, models, and practices. Finally, to steal one from Sous, a commitment to responsibility on part of everyone in this country is needed. We are quick to forget Enron and to think that this problem has been solved because Kenneth Lay is dead and Jeff Skilling is in jail, but it is not.

I wish I could offer a more detailed solution, but I do not have a Doctorate of Philosophy in Economics.

For the Love of God, Can We Please Do This...

Can we please...PLEASE, make a soapbox racer and do this next year? With all of your political awareness and my scientific prowess, we could make a soapbox racer the likes of which the world has never, ever, ever seen.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dePv4LAMe3M&feature=related

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

I now support the theory of evolution

Thanks to this recent article published in Science, I am considering becoming a supporter of the theory of evolution.

"Ancient Fish Heads for Land"
http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2008/1016/2

Throughout my career as a biology major at Davidson, I found that the evidence supporting the theory of evolution seemed misinterpreted and didn't quite hold water. I was always skeptical of new presentations of such evidence. However, this recent article finally put all the pieces together for me. I think evolution might actually be real.

Thanks Tiktaalik roseae. You finally made some sense out of this theory.

Friday, October 17, 2008

The Words of Warren.

Not surprisingly, Warren Buffet, the godfather of Financial America, has come up a lot in recent months.

First, his recent major play of 8 billion dollars in the stock market, particularly with JP Morgan and GE, struck a vote of confidence, albeit brief, through the sector. And to give his move some perspective, his sum investment is over a tenth of the current behemoth bailout plan. Wow. For many, this was Warren being Warren: trusting the long-term success of the United States economy and raking in the wealth from not being afraid to make moves that contradict the financial-herd sensibilities.

Then his name kept popping up in the presidential debates, where both candidates, trusting his judgment concerning financial matters, cited him to be a top candidate for the next Treasury Secretary. A great choice, but even if Warren is not offered the position, Obama and McCain want Warren so much so that both are seriously considering him to play another prominent role within the government (that is, God willing, he accepts).

Now, his editorial in this morning's Times. His piece, which I've included in its entirety below, illustrates that things have gotten so bad and so serious, that Buffet felt the need, like never before, to assuage the fears of an entire country. This is something he has rarely, if ever, done, so we might want to pay attention.

Without further ado:

Buy American. I Am.

By WARREN E. BUFFETT
Published: October 16, 2008

THE financial world is a mess, both in the United States and abroad. Its problems, moreover, have been leaking into the general economy, and the leaks are now turning into a gusher. In the near term, unemployment will rise, business activity will falter and headlines will continue to be scary.

So ... I’ve been buying American stocks. This is my personal account I’m talking about, in which I previously owned nothing but United States government bonds. (This description leaves aside my Berkshire Hathaway holdings, which are all committed to philanthropy.) If prices keep looking attractive, my non-Berkshire net worth will soon be 100 percent in United States equities.

Why?

A simple rule dictates my buying: Be fearful when others are greedy, and be greedy when others are fearful. And most certainly, fear is now widespread, gripping even seasoned investors. To be sure, investors are right to be wary of highly leveraged entities or businesses in weak competitive positions. But fears regarding the long-term prosperity of the nation’s many sound companies make no sense. These businesses will indeed suffer earnings hiccups, as they always have. But most major companies will be setting new profit records 5, 10 and 20 years from now.

Let me be clear on one point: I can’t predict the short-term movements of the stock market. I haven’t the faintest idea as to whether stocks will be higher or lower a month — or a year — from now. What is likely, however, is that the market will move higher, perhaps substantially so, well before either sentiment or the economy turns up. So if you wait for the robins, spring will be over.

A little history here: During the Depression, the Dow hit its low, 41, on July 8, 1932. Economic conditions, though, kept deteriorating until Franklin D. Roosevelt took office in March 1933. By that time, the market had already advanced 30 percent. Or think back to the early days of World War II, when things were going badly for the United States in Europe and the Pacific. The market hit bottom in April 1942, well before Allied fortunes turned. Again, in the early 1980s, the time to buy stocks was when inflation raged and the economy was in the tank. In short, bad news is an investor’s best friend. It lets you buy a slice of America’s future at a marked-down price.

Over the long term, the stock market news will be good. In the 20th century, the United States endured two world wars and other traumatic and expensive military conflicts; the Depression; a dozen or so recessions and financial panics; oil shocks; a flu epidemic; and the resignation of a disgraced president. Yet the Dow rose from 66 to 11,497.

You might think it would have been impossible for an investor to lose money during a century marked by such an extraordinary gain. But some investors did. The hapless ones bought stocks only when they felt comfort in doing so and then proceeded to sell when the headlines made them queasy.

Today people who hold cash equivalents feel comfortable. They shouldn’t. They have opted for a terrible long-term asset, one that pays virtually nothing and is certain to depreciate in value. Indeed, the policies that government will follow in its efforts to alleviate the current crisis will probably prove inflationary and therefore accelerate declines in the real value of cash accounts.

Equities will almost certainly outperform cash over the next decade, probably by a substantial degree. Those investors who cling now to cash are betting they can efficiently time their move away from it later. In waiting for the comfort of good news, they are ignoring Wayne Gretzky’s advice: “I skate to where the puck is going to be, not to where it has been.”

I don’t like to opine on the stock market, and again I emphasize that I have no idea what the market will do in the short term. Nevertheless, I’ll follow the lead of a restaurant that opened in an empty bank building and then advertised: “Put your mouth where your money was.” Today my money and my mouth both say equities.

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Musings on Politics and the Economy

Hello again. First off - Beaux, great post.

I was sitting with my work team this afternoon, watching the news about the markets falling enormously for another time today. The economy is clearly in shambles - a crisis widely accepted to be unlike any since the crash of 1929. As we near the election of a new President, much focus falls upon the proposals of these two candidates to reverse the global economic calamity we face today. I got to doing some more musing, and here's what I came up with...

The root of the problem we're facing right now is sub-prime mortgages, and with that, bad credit. Essentially, Americans who could not afford to pay back their loans took out large "sub-prime mortgages," which enabled them to spend well beyond their means, particularly taking out loans to purchase real estate. The $700 billion now allocated to buy up these bad mortgages - essentially giving a free pass to those who took them out - will serve to remove the financial burden off of these Americans. My concern comes with this "bailout" plan which, as I mentioned above, rewards - with a free pass - many Americans who, cutting through much of the bullshit, made irresponsible financial decisions. Conversely, the bailout plan does not reward, and, paired with Obama's tax plan, could actually penalize, other Americans who have been financially conservative and responsible, and who are equally financially strapped because of the world's current economic turmoil.

It can be argued that, well, it's human nature to want to get the most one can and take the most from an opportunity... therefore, when someone making $30k per year takes out a mortgage on a $1 million house, human nature must be the culprit, the motivation. Along with this line of thought, it would therefore be the fault of the banks, who enticed Americans to take out these ridiculous mortgages. And it's true... much of the fault does fall on the offending banks.

But my problem really comes down to personal accountability, which seems to have gone out the window. As a new player in the "real world," I of course need to be prudent with my spending, balancing my costs with my income, and keeping close track of my accounts. While I would like to eat out every night, buy new suits (stud), and drive a BMW, I know - the numbers show me - that I cannot necessarily afford to. Now, with careful allocation and investment of my income, I know that I'll eventually be able to afford these things. Even at 22, I am making financially responsible decisions with the small amount of money I have.

At its most basic level, it is not difficult to identify and stick to one's financial bounds - regardless of what tax bracket someone belongs to - and while some people may be more strapped financially than others, that should not be an excuse to act irresponsibly financially. Rather than ignorance as an excuse, taking out enormous mortgages - and knowing you cannot pay them back - is greed. As I wrote earlier today, 1 in 6 Americans owe more money than the value of their house. That is baffling and unacceptable. Is this fair to the many people in this country - across any and all tax brackets - who have worked damn hard and planned carefully to build a stable and responsible financial base? While there are certainly criminals on Wall Street who have taken complete advantage of investors to fill their own pockets, acting irresponsibly, unethically and greedily, there are many, many hard-working people in this country who don't deserve to be ripped off by the financially irresponsible and greedy in this country.

I have a problem with the "bailout" plan in place and with Obama's plan to tax the top 5% - those who earn $250,000 or above - "because they can afford it." A blanket tax schema of this sort does not make sense to me. While "taking from the rich and giving to the poor" might have worked well for Robin Hood in the oppressive aristocracy of Britain, the same type of policy will not work in the U.S. today. There is a sense of entitlement in this country; the mind-set of working hard to earn one's living, a former staple of the American way, has fallen off course. Those members of American society who have worked hard and acted ethically and responsibly and have earned their $250,000+ (or whatever amount they earn) should not be forced to make up the burden left by some members of this country who feel entitled to what America offers, and who have let greed - not reason, responsibility, or need - shape their irresponsible financial decisions.

"Bradley Effect", "Reverse Bradley Effect," or Color Blindness

There has been a lot of talk lately that Barack Hussein Obama may fall victim to the dreaded "Bradley Effect." For those of you who don't know what that is; (I didn't until a few weeks ago) the Bradley Effect is named for the former California gubernatorial candidate Tom Bradley. In the 1982 governor's race, Bradley was showing double digit leads in the polls however when election day rolled around, such was not the case, in fact he lost. See, Tom Bradley was African-American and when the pollsters asked the people questions like "would you vote for a non-white candidate" they typically answered that they would, or that they were undecided. However, on election day, they were not so tolerant. Some speculate that when people go to the voting booth there is some sort of social desirability bias and they vote for the white candidate. I have noticed that a lot down here in LA. People say race is not an issue, but when push comes to shove, it is. Whether they know it or not.

Not all people buy into the Bradley Effect. In fact Barack Obama's campaign has lead many to offer an contradictory theory. This other side claims that because of race, Obama's poll numbers are underrepresented and when asked to vote, the voters ignore the race issue. For instance, black voters may be hesitant to say that they will support him and then on election day, they pull a reverse of the Bradley effect. Obama's Super Tuesday victories showed some signs of polls both over and under representing the actual results.

So what will it be? Bradley, Reverse Bradley, or soemthing else? I hope that it is something else. I hope that on election day race is not a factor. I think the Bradley effect shows problems in our society and I think that the Reverse Bradley effect shows the same problem. As you are learning right now Fitz, the reverse of flawed reasoning is still flawed reasoning.

The ongoing fight for Civil Rights is not fighting for the inverse of the old. It is hoping for a new America. Race should not be an issue. Anthropologically, the concept of "race" is a myth. It should be politically too. I hope that when Americans go to the polls, they cast their vote not because of race. Voting for Obama because he is black is no better than not voting for him because he is black. It is still basing a decision on the superficial. "Let us not judge men by the color of their skin, but by the Content of their Character."

Musings on Politics and the Environment

In advance of tonight's Presidential debate, I've spent some downtime at work sipping a coffee and musing about what I'm going to find most important for the next President. Clearly the economy is a major concern right now, and will require a great deal of change to get it strong again so that we can afford plane tickets to reunite, perhaps in Vegas. The credibility of the country abroad is also something that has been gravely damaged over the last eight years, and needs a good fixin'. But, being a good flag-waving, canoe-paddling, moccassin-wearing, "eh?"-saying Canadian, my biggest concern for the next four years is the environment. I've been ranting and thinking about it for a good amount of time now. It's not news to anyone that we're in a predicament. The IPCC - a commission of over 10,000 well-respected scientists from around the world - reported in 2004 that by 2012, great changes need to happen in the amount of emissions that go up into the atmosphere to slow the trends of global warming, and if the necessary action is not taken, the earth's climate is likely to reach a breaking point... terrible droughts and forest fires in some areas of the world, catastrophic flooding and hurricanes in others. It's even possible - so I learned from my Marine Ecology professor in Madrid - that the oceans currents (which regulate the world's weather patterns, and are fueled by discrepancies in water temperature, causing cold water to sink and warm water to rise) could slow or stop entirely if the planet's ocean temperatures continue to rise. For example, Europe's latitude is akin to northern Canada's, but the continent's temperatures are much like those of the Eastern seaboard of the US. The reason: the Gulf Stream brings warm water from Caribbean up along the Eastern seaboard, across the Atlantic, and down the European coast, keeping the region moderate in temperature. Without those currents in place, Europe becomes like Hudson Bay, which would only help to give polar bears a place to live now that their sea-ice is disappearing so rapidly.

Anyway, the environment and climate crisis really has strong ties into political and economic arenas throughout the world. Did you know, for instance, that there is a negative correlation between the price of oil and the level of democracy in the world's petro-dictatorships?... that is, the levels of freedom and democracy in those nations increases as oil prices fall, and vice-versa. As petrodictators gain more and more wealth, they have more and more influence over religious institutions (the Saudi brand of Islam preaches a much more fundamentalist/radical version than that in Pakistan, or even in Iran before Ahmenijad (sp?) took over), and they can prop up their economies and societies with oil revenue so that capitalism, innovation, and women's rights get lost in the fold. So, America - historically the international champion of capitalism and individual freedom for the oppressed - actually directly restricts the ability of the citizens of those countries (Russia, Saudi Arabia, Iran, to name a few) to live freely and democratically by refusing to wean itself off foreign oil. Domestic oil seems to be fine (as all these Republican "Drill baby, drill" shouters keep shouting) as an alternative to foreign oil, but it is short-sighted and does little (read: nothing) to wean the country from oil dependency in general and begin a true path to energy independence, which anyone with any foresight would be able to recognize, as the world's oil supply is not unlimited. In order to truly get there, the country needs to do a lot more than the "25 Easy Steps to Being Green" or to turning off the lights during game 4 of the ALCS... while they are nice gestures and may draw attention to the need for Americans to reign in their rampant excesses (whether it be food intake or energy (gas, electricity) consumption) and to act in an environmentally sustainable and responsible manner, they also reinforce the idea that acting "green" is easy, and the current debacle of the planet can be solved with such simple measures. Rather, it requires dedication on revolutionary levels, and I'm concerned that neither McCain nor Obama will implement the full change needed.

Revolutionary levels mean laws and dedication. The current gas mileage goals of the US for 2020 are the levels imposed by European countries NOW. Instead of enforcing strict emissions standards for automobiles, the government offers a relaxed attitude, essentially saying "we'll get to this later." Later will be too late. While it will be unpopular for some - special interest groups and auto companies specifically - strict emissions regulations would be a beneficial longterm goal. This is just one example, but really, government needs to get involved to make strict regulations and get our country on track for energy efficiency and independence, and then let the ingenuity of American corporations and innovators to figure out ways to get it done.

That is all for now. Thank you for reading my rant.

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

It's 5 o'clock in Glasgow

This is my first post in this blog. It's not going to be super sweet, like all of my upcoming posts will be. However, I just want to make known that I'm the fourth wheel on this powerhouse of political, artistic and existential ranting. I'll just take some time to introduce myself.

I grew up in a family of 6. These are my three brothers:

I am a grown ass man of 22 years.

I am balding prematurely, much like my older brother, the guy who looks borderline retarded.

I like to do arts.

I want to be a doctor.

I am currently unemployed, but I just got a job working in a lab encouraging mice to procreate so I can take out the eyeballs of their offspring. We're doing retina research. It's pretty cool I guess. I don't know, I haven't done it yet.

I really like the other guys contributing to this "blog."

I hate "blogs."

Monday, October 13, 2008

A Day On The Links

"[Tacitus], you're an Obama guy, right?"

Well of course Tacitus is an Obama guy. But, not wanting to ruin the next two hours of my life, I grudgingly said that, well, yes, Tacitus is a supporter of Barack Obama and then, instead of arguing, simply listened.

_____________________________
Brian, by most standards, is a reasonably intelligent, very successful salesmen in the medical/pharmaceutical business. As, if not more, intelligent were the two young Wachovia analysts who rounded out the foursome on the golf course. Ten holes in and a few beers down (a lot of beers down for Brian) the polite golf talk of club choice, general banalities, and random bursts of expletives general banalities turned toward the upcoming election. And Tacitus was in the minority.

Brian is a self-described, "conservative from another generation." He dislikes the, to quote, "multicultural" nature of Chicago, where he resided for 25 years; he can do without about eight million of the eight million people who live there. He lambastes the "niggers" who broke into his car in New Haven, Connecticut, but is quick to cover by saying he isn't a racist. He, correctly, points out that McCain has missed so many valuable opportunities within his campaign to regain control of the election. Brian thinks Barack Obama would be terrible for the White House for two main reasons. First, Brian duly notes Obama has no experience whatsoever, despite my objection that he was a law professor at UoChicago for twelve years. Second, Ron can not imagine Obama's "bitch of a wife promenading around the White House in hats."

The young analysts were also McCain supporters. Though much more sober and much less supportive of the character attacks on Obama, their arguments for McCain followed a similar, generic storyline: because Obama is bad for our country, our economy, my job, his job. Their biggest gripe seemed to come over the unneccesary regulation Obama and the Democrats would impose on the financial sector. Second to that the issue to them was of Obama's far-left, liberal-leaning record which pushed them toward McCain.

Interestingly, all of their evidence for McCain was not based on McCain at all, but because of the failures and/or weaknesses of Obama (save for the implied joke that voters should choose McCain because of sexual chemistry between he, Sarah Palin and/or Mrs. McCain; I'll spare the readers the details)
.

Not one person gave direct evidence for their support of McCain, but implicitly, there's still a lot to take away from this. Namely that many voters who choose McCain do so because he is NOT half black, NOT going to impose regulations into the financial sector, NOT married to a bitch, and, finally, HAS the fantastical
possibility of having sexual relations with his running mate.

Further, there was no mention of the war in Iraq or Afghanistan, our national debt problem, the future of globalized political and economic systems, the quarter of Americans living below the poverty line (many of whom are veterans), the need for adjusted/reevaluated regulation into the financial industry, the fact that the current Republican president has increased the size of government to Great Depression-esque enormity.


Nope. None of that rational political discussion. Just that McCain isn't Obama, and so McCain is the way we should go.


After that round, it became clear the hockey moms and Joe Six-Packs aren't the only ones buying into the McCainian "Hate Week" rhetoric and the eagerness to vilify candidates on the most base level has even spread to those with education, with wealth, and with significant influence in 2008 election.

Sunday, October 12, 2008

Canadian Thanksgiving


Yo. Happy Canadian Thanksgiving. I've been asked many, many times what the Canadian Thanksgiving is for. As we should all be aware, the Pilgrims, intent on founding a settlement that "should be as a citty upon a hill" (Winthrop, 1630) actually landed in Plymouth and relied upon the hospitality of native peoples for their survival, generosity which would later be repaid in full at the end of the 19th century (see: Trail of Tears, 1831, and Wounded Knee Massacre, 1890).


Anyway, so I'm sitting here watching football and having a "Harvest Moon" from the producers of "Blue Moon"... it is brewed with pumpkin, which is very seasonal and I find it very appropriate to this current Canadian celebration of the harvest. I've actually been pretty happy with the autumn seasonal beer selection. Beaux - I bought Abita Pecan Harvest beer the other night, it was delicious, and it said "Brewed with Louisianna Pecans", so I thought of you, naturally. Also, I thought back to a night at the Brick House - I believe it was last November - when you (Beauxregard), Marcos, and I sat outside smoking stogies and enjoying flavorful brews. Good times.


I went for hikes both yesterday afternoon and this morning with my Mom and dog (Pepper, 12, miniature schnauzer, athlete) and it was great walking around outside... the leaves are changing wonderfully up here and the air is nice and cool. Instead of talking about just "normal" stuff with my Mom, I asked her to tell me stuff that I didn't know. Stuff about her college life, family life, stories about her Dad, etc. and I learned a lot. Having my parents back on this side of the country (they've moved from Seattle) is awesome, and I try as much as possible to make the most of the time we can have together... nothing like spending time and hearing stories that will make them laugh out loud or get all emotional because they haven't thought of a particular funny or sad story in years.


That's all I got for now. Gotta go help my Mom finish making dinner... we bought a leg of lamb that we're roasting, potatoes (we got awesome purple, yellow and red ones), asparagus (mmm... smelly pee), and salad, and an apple pie for desert. Then its back up to Hartford tonight to continue racking up hotel points.


Hasta.


Sous

Friday, October 10, 2008

Banksy?


While procrastinating during Criminal Law today, I came across this pretty sweet "artist." Some may in fact call him a menace to society or a criminal in his own right, but I think he his pretty cool. His name is Banksy and he is from Bristol, England. And, that is about all we know about him. He started off as a graffiti artist and has since moved into some outrageous studio art. The most interesting thing about him, is that nobody really know who in the hell he is. Obviously, painting on building is a crime, so it doesn't make sense to publicize your role in the deed.

Banksy has started to use stencils alot in the last few years, in the interest of time and I think that they look great. You can see for yourself by looking at his website. He likes to poke fun at the police brutality, the media,advertisements, and some other flaws in our society.

The first picture up at the top is currently the background of my computer.
This next one is in New Orleans. It seems to ask the question of what life will be like for the children of Katrina?


This one is also from New Orleans, it is a pretty sweet example of using the existing buildings.


Ok I'm going to stop trying to play art critic, but I think these are all pretty effing fly.
http://www.banksy.co.uk/menu.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/7662797.stm




Wednesday, October 8, 2008

Tacitus For Election 2008


he original Tacitus, the Roman historian and senator, was much like a modern day socio-political-historiographer journalist; if a journalist could become a politician. Tacitus was heralded as one of the finest writers of his day and was best known for deep, though pessimistic, insights into the nature of power. His written work, the Histories and Annals, spanned the reign of the Roman Empire at its heights under Augustus to the beginning of the slow decline from power over the course of the century.

With the upcoming disposal of the current United States president, one whose approval rating is the lowest of any president, ever, and, on the other hand, one of the presidential hopeful's peculiar journey to the candidacy, I offer you a relevant passage from the original Tacitus on the reactions to Nero's death in 69 A.D.:


Welcome as the death of Nero had been in the first burst of joy, yet it had not only roused various emotions in Rome, among the Senators, the people, or the soldiery of the capital, it had also excited all the legions and their generals; for now had been divulged that secret of the empire, that emperors could be made elsewhere than at Rome.